<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Misrepresentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/</link>
	<description>Sex. Relationships. Dating. That&#039;s what I&#039;m talkin&#039; &#039;bout.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-35847</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-35847</guid>
		<description>Great article. There&#039;s a lot of good data here, though I did want to let you know something - I am running Fedora with the circulating beta of Firefox, and the look and feel of your blog is kind of quirky for me. I can understand the articles, but the navigation doesn&#039;t work so great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. There&#8217;s a lot of good data here, though I did want to let you know something &#8211; I am running Fedora with the circulating beta of Firefox, and the look and feel of your blog is kind of quirky for me. I can understand the articles, but the navigation doesn&#8217;t work so great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only ever met one man under 5&#039;8&quot; who told the truth about his height. If a man says he&#039;s 5&#039;6&quot;, that means he&#039;s about 5&#039;3&quot; maybe 5&#039;4&quot;. If I have to tilt my head down to look you in the eye you&#039;re not 5&#039;8&quot;. Its silly....Like come on&#039;, you didn&#039;t think I was going to notice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only ever met one man under 5&#8217;8&#8243; who told the truth about his height. If a man says he&#8217;s 5&#8217;6&#8243;, that means he&#8217;s about 5&#8217;3&#8243; maybe 5&#8217;4&#8243;. If I have to tilt my head down to look you in the eye you&#8217;re not 5&#8217;8&#8243;. Its silly&#8230;.Like come on&#8217;, you didn&#8217;t think I was going to notice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime aka Jmeezay</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-4650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime aka Jmeezay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-4650</guid>
		<description>Word to Big Bird! This blog is sooooo unbelievably on point.

I&#039;ve done the whole online thing and I&#039;ve always been honest.  Age, body type, recent pictures, etc.  I have been disappointed many a time by someone who lied in one way or another.  Men are big on lyiing about height (every man under 5&#039;10 claims to be that height at some point) and I just can&#039;t stand it.  If you&#039;re going to lie about dumb things like this, then what am I to suspect if things go any further? Blech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word to Big Bird! This blog is sooooo unbelievably on point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done the whole online thing and I&#8217;ve always been honest.  Age, body type, recent pictures, etc.  I have been disappointed many a time by someone who lied in one way or another.  Men are big on lyiing about height (every man under 5&#8217;10 claims to be that height at some point) and I just can&#8217;t stand it.  If you&#8217;re going to lie about dumb things like this, then what am I to suspect if things go any further? Blech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>Dan, 
I&#039;ve looked around at what other women are doing and it is much more likely that a woman who is maybe thirty pounds overweight to misrepresent herself. I call myself a bbw though I&#039;m not sure that is what I am any longer, however, I don&#039;t care. I figure he might be pleasantly surprised by me. I have full length pics of me from spring time fun with friends. So no offense, but I&#039;m calling BS on that one! I won&#039;t say that we aren&#039;t guilty of a multitude of sins, but I will say that I know a lot of bigger women who have profiles on dating sites and they don&#039;t say they are slim and trim. They tell it like it is. What I&#039;d like to know is why do men say you are so pretty when its all out there baby for them to see, and their profiles say they only want thin or athletic built women. I can&#039;t be running into every guy just wants to get laid cause several of them I&#039;ve dated more than once and haven&#039;t slept with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
I&#8217;ve looked around at what other women are doing and it is much more likely that a woman who is maybe thirty pounds overweight to misrepresent herself. I call myself a bbw though I&#8217;m not sure that is what I am any longer, however, I don&#8217;t care. I figure he might be pleasantly surprised by me. I have full length pics of me from spring time fun with friends. So no offense, but I&#8217;m calling BS on that one! I won&#8217;t say that we aren&#8217;t guilty of a multitude of sins, but I will say that I know a lot of bigger women who have profiles on dating sites and they don&#8217;t say they are slim and trim. They tell it like it is. What I&#8217;d like to know is why do men say you are so pretty when its all out there baby for them to see, and their profiles say they only want thin or athletic built women. I can&#8217;t be running into every guy just wants to get laid cause several of them I&#8217;ve dated more than once and haven&#8217;t slept with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>Wow, I just read almost all of the posts here and had to chime in.  I have online dated for a long time, my career is one reason, my boyish shyness another... OK, I suck at making the approach, so online is a good way for me to go.  I have an ex-wife I met online, and she was exactly who she said she was... I just didn&#039;t listen LOL.  I have had one other semi serious relationship and several dates from online and the number one reason I am still single is that women misrepresent themselves!  I have done everything with my profiles on different sites even stating in bold letter that if you aren&#039;t at least 50 pounds lighter than me (at the time I was 6 foot and 210) I am not likely to be interested.  Women with 10 year old pics would reel me in, and wonder why I wanted to run to the bar instead of have dinner when we met.  The article is soooo true, be honest, my profile says I have a few extra pounds.... I do, but I know that not everyone would see me that way, some would say I am just average others might say I&#039;m a big fat guy, that is why I POST A PIC THAT SHOWS MY TORSO!!!!  That way women can see who I am, and what I mean by a few extra pounds.  There are a lot of men that want or like big women, so why play games with guys that don&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just read almost all of the posts here and had to chime in.  I have online dated for a long time, my career is one reason, my boyish shyness another&#8230; OK, I suck at making the approach, so online is a good way for me to go.  I have an ex-wife I met online, and she was exactly who she said she was&#8230; I just didn&#8217;t listen LOL.  I have had one other semi serious relationship and several dates from online and the number one reason I am still single is that women misrepresent themselves!  I have done everything with my profiles on different sites even stating in bold letter that if you aren&#8217;t at least 50 pounds lighter than me (at the time I was 6 foot and 210) I am not likely to be interested.  Women with 10 year old pics would reel me in, and wonder why I wanted to run to the bar instead of have dinner when we met.  The article is soooo true, be honest, my profile says I have a few extra pounds&#8230;. I do, but I know that not everyone would see me that way, some would say I am just average others might say I&#8217;m a big fat guy, that is why I POST A PIC THAT SHOWS MY TORSO!!!!  That way women can see who I am, and what I mean by a few extra pounds.  There are a lot of men that want or like big women, so why play games with guys that don&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzie</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem that I had during the 2-3 years I searched for dates online was that almost every man who responded to me was married... to which they&#039;d never admit until after the first date, even though I made it clear in my profile that I was NOT interested in married or otherwise &#039;taken&#039; men.

I eventually married a longtime friend whose personal history is an open book to me, and we&#039;re happy as two toddlers in a sandbox. We didn&#039;t meet online. We met the old-fashioned way -- in a bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem that I had during the 2-3 years I searched for dates online was that almost every man who responded to me was married&#8230; to which they&#8217;d never admit until after the first date, even though I made it clear in my profile that I was NOT interested in married or otherwise &#8216;taken&#8217; men.</p>
<p>I eventually married a longtime friend whose personal history is an open book to me, and we&#8217;re happy as two toddlers in a sandbox. We didn&#8217;t meet online. We met the old-fashioned way &#8212; in a bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>&quot;Frankenberry???&quot;  YOUR age should be no mystery! lol Great blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Frankenberry???&#8221;  YOUR age should be no mystery! lol Great blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>Those particular five?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those particular five?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darik</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>Darik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>Bertie,

   I have read on the website that supports the book that the 10 can be a mix or match, but predominately the 5 are set to each sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bertie,</p>
<p>   I have read on the website that supports the book that the 10 can be a mix or match, but predominately the 5 are set to each sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/online-misrepresentation/169/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidwygant.com/blogroll/online-misrepresentation/#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>Darik,
In this book, does it talk about different needs at different ages? Cause with the exception of good conversation and honesty/openness, I have guy &quot;needs&quot;. Last time I checked, I was still very female.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darik,<br />
In this book, does it talk about different needs at different ages? Cause with the exception of good conversation and honesty/openness, I have guy &#8220;needs&#8221;. Last time I checked, I was still very female.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

